Standards Worldwide
Standards Worldwide
Phone +49 30 58885700-07

Standard [CURRENT]

ASTM E 2208:2002

Standard Guide for Evaluating Non-Contacting Optical Strain Measurement Systems

Publication date
2002 reapproved: 2018
Original language
English
Pages
7

from 73.80 EUR VAT included

from 68.97 EUR VAT excluded

Format and language options

PDF download
  • 73.80 EUR

Shipment (3-5 working days)
  • 82.10 EUR

Monitor with the Standards Ticker

This option is only available after login.
Easily subscribe: Save time and money now!

You can also subscribe to this document - together with other important standards in your industry. This makes your work easier and pays for itself after a short time.

Sparschwein_data
Subscription advantages
Sparschwein Vorteil 1_data

Important standards for your industry, regularly updated

Sparschwein Vorteil 2_data

Much cheaper than buying individually

Sparschwein Vorteil 3_data

Useful functions: Filters, version comparison and more

Publication date
2002 reapproved: 2018
Original language
English
Pages
7

Quick delivery via download or delivery service

Buy securely with a credit card or pay upon receipt of invoice

All transactions are encrypted

Short description
1.1 The purpose of this document is to assist potential users in understanding the issues related to the accuracy of non-contacting strain measurement systems and to provide a common framework for quantitative comparison of optical systems. The output from a non-contacting optical strain and deformation measurement system is generally divided into optical data and image analysis data. Optical data contains information related to specimen strains and the image analysis process converts the encoded optical information into strain data. The enclosed document describes potential sources of error in the strain data and describes general methods for quantifying the error and estimating the accuracy of the measurements when applying non-contacting methods to the study of events for which the optical integration time is much smaller than the inverse of the maximum temporal frequency in the encoded data (that is, events that can be regarded as static during the integration time). A brief application of the approach, along with specific examples defining the various terms, is given in the Appendix.
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...