Standards Worldwide
Standards Worldwide
Phone +49 30 58885700-07

Standard [CURRENT]

SAE J 2215:2021-01-07

Surface Match Verification Method for Pressure Sensitive Adhesively Attached Components

Publication date
2021-01-07
Original language
English
Pages
5

67.40 EUR VAT included

62.99 EUR VAT excluded

Format and language options

PDF download
  • 67.40 EUR

Shipment (3-5 working days)
  • 67.40 EUR

Monitor with the Standards Ticker

This option is only available after login.
Easily subscribe: Save time and money now!

You can also subscribe to this document - together with other important standards in your industry. This makes your work easier and pays for itself after a short time.

Sparschwein_data
Subscription advantages
Sparschwein Vorteil 1_data

Important standards for your industry, regularly updated

Sparschwein Vorteil 2_data

Much cheaper than buying individually

Sparschwein Vorteil 3_data

Useful functions: Filters, version comparison and more

Publication date
2021-01-07
Original language
English
Pages
5

Quick delivery via download or delivery service

Buy securely with a credit card or pay upon receipt of invoice

All transactions are encrypted

Short description
This SAE Recommended Practice applies to evaluation of the conformance match condition existing between two surfaces. Evaluation of this conformance may be especially useful in bonded applications although it may also have relevance to bolted adjacent surface joint conditions. Since good bonding surface conformity is necessary for providing optimal bond performance with pressure sensitive adhesives, the purpose of this document is to provide a method of evaluating the conformance match of the mating surfaces. This document is intended as a guide toward standard practice but may be subject to frequent change to keep pace with experience and technical advances. This should be kept in mind when considering the use of this document. Tool types, materials, application tools, and component contact area evaluation methods are included as part of this document. In most cases a visual evaluation of contact performance may be satisfactory; however, for greater accuracy a measurement tool may be used. When reporting a contact value the mode of evaluation (e. g., visual, measurement tool) should be indicated.
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...