Standards Worldwide
Standards Worldwide
Phone +49 30 58885700-07

Standard [CURRENT]

ASTM E 1706:2020

Standard Test Method for Measuring the Toxicity of Sediment-Associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates

Publication date
2020
Original language
English
Pages
162

from 135.90 EUR VAT included

from 127.01 EUR VAT excluded

Format and language options

PDF download
  • 135.90 EUR

  • 163.10 EUR

Shipment (3-5 working days)
  • 151.10 EUR

Monitor with the Standards Ticker

This option is only available after login.
Easily subscribe: Save time and money now!

You can also subscribe to this document - together with other important standards in your industry. This makes your work easier and pays for itself after a short time.

Sparschwein_data
Subscription advantages
Sparschwein Vorteil 1_data

Important standards for your industry, regularly updated

Sparschwein Vorteil 2_data

Much cheaper than buying individually

Sparschwein Vorteil 3_data

Useful functions: Filters, version comparison and more

Publication date
2020
Original language
English
Pages
162
DOI
https://dx.doi.org/10.1520/E1706-20

Quick delivery via download or delivery service

Buy securely with a credit card or pay upon receipt of invoice

All transactions are encrypted

Short description
1.1 Relevance of Sediment Contamination- Sediment provides habitat for many aquatic organisms and is a major repository for many of the more persistent chemicals that are introduced into surface waters. In the aquatic environment, both organic and inorganic chemicals may accumulate in sediment, which can in turn serve as a source of exposure for organisms living on or in sediment. Contaminated sediments may be directly toxic to aquatic life or can be a source of contaminants for bioaccumulation in the food chain. 1.2 Sediment Assessment Tools- Several types of information may be useful in assessing the risk, or potential risk, posed by sediment contaminants, including: ( 1 ) chemical analysis of sediment contaminants; ( 2 ) sediment toxicity tests, ( 3 ) bioaccumulation tests; and ( 4 ) surveys of benthic community structure. Each of these provides a different type of information to the assessment, and integrating information from all four lines of evidence may often provide the most robust assessments. 1.3 Strengths of Toxicity Testing of Contaminated Sediments- Directly assessing the toxicity of contaminated sediments provides some of the same advantages to sediment assessment that whole effluent toxicity testing provides to management of industrial and municipal effluents. As for effluent tests, direct testing of sediment toxicity allows the assessment of biological effects even if: ( 1 ) the identities of toxic chemicals present are not (or not completely) known; ( 2 ) the influence of site-specific characteristics of sediments on toxicity (bioavailability) is not understood; and ( 3 ) the interactive or aggregate effects of mixtures of chemicals present are not known or cannot be adequately predicted. In addition, testing the response of benthic or epibenthic organisms exposed via sediment provides an assessment that is based on the same routes of exposure that would exist in nature, rather than only through water column exposure. 1.4 Relating Sediment Exposure to Toxicity- One of the challenges with sediment assessment is that the toxicity of sediment contaminants can vary greatly with differences in sediment characteristics; a bulk sediment concentration (normalized to dry weight) may be sufficient to cause toxicity in one sediment, while the same concentration in another sediment does not cause toxicity (for example, Adams et al. 1985) ( 1 ) . 2 Factors such as the amount and characteristics of the organic carbon present in sediment can alter the bioavailability of many chemicals (Di Toro et al. 1991 ( 2 ) ; Ghosh 2007 ( 3 ) ), as can other characteristics such as acid volatile sulfide or iron and manganese oxides (Di Toro et al. 1990 ( 4 ) , Tessier et al. 1996 ( 5 ) ). Direct measurement of toxicity in contaminated sediments can provide a means to measure the aggregate effects of such factors on the bioavailability of sediment toxicants. 1.5 Understanding the Causes of Sediment Toxicity- While direct testing of sediment toxicity has the advantage of being able to detect the effects of any toxic chemical present, it has the disadvantage of not providing any specific indication of what chemical or chemicals are causing the observed responses. Other techniques, such as spiked-sediment toxicity tests or Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) methods for sediments have been developed and are available to help evaluate cause/effect relationships (USEPA 2007) ( 6 ) . 1.6 Uses of Sediment Toxicity Tests- Toxicity tests conducted on sediments collected from field locations can be used to: ( 1 ) conduct surveys of sediment quality as measured by sediment toxicity; ( 2 ) prioritize areas of sediment for more detailed investigation of sediment contamination; ( 3 ) determine the spatial extent of sediment toxicity; ( 4 ) compare the sensitivity of different organisms to sediment contamination; ( 5 ) evaluate the relationship between the degree of sediment contamination and biological effects along a contamination gradient; ( 6 ) evaluate the suitability of sediments for removal and placement at other location (for example, dredged material disposal); ( 7 ) help establish goals for remedial actions; and ( 8 ) assess the effectiveness of remedial actions at reducing sediment toxicity. These applications are generally targeted at assessing the likely biological effects of bedded sediments at field sites at the time of sampling. However, toxicity testing of natural or artificial sediments spiked with known quantities of chemicals can also be used to evaluate additional questions such as: ( 1 ) determining the potency of a chemical to organisms exposed via sediment; ( 2 ) evaluating the effect of sediment composition on chemical bioavailability or toxicity; ( 3 ) informing chemical-specific risk assessments for chemicals that may accumulate and persist in sediments upon release; ( 4 ) establishing regulatory guidance for chemicals in water or sediment. Spiked sediment studies have the advantage of allowing uni-variate experiments in which exposure gradients can be reliably constructed; as such they lend themselves to the derivation of standardized point estimates of effect, such as a median lethal concentration (LC50) or concentration reducing sublethal performance by a specified amount, such as an effect concentration (for example, EC20 estimated to reduce weight of test organisms by 20%). 1.7 Limitations- While some safety considerations are included in this standard, it is beyond the scope of this standard to encompass all safety requirements necessary to conduct sediment toxicity tests. 1.8 This standard is arranged as follows: Section Scope 1 Referenced Documents 2 Terminology 3 Summary of Test Methods 4 Significance and Use 5 Interferences 6 Water, Formulated Sediments, Reagents 7 Health, Safety, Waste Management, Biosecurity 8 Facilities, Equipment, and Supplies 9 Sample Collection, Storage, Characterization, and Spiking 10 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 11 Collection, Culturing, and Maintaining the Amphipod Hyalella azteca and the Midge Chironomus dilutus 12 Interpretation of Results and and Reporting 13 Precision and Bias 14 Keywords 15 Annexes Guidance for 10-d Sediment or Water Toxicity Tests with the Amphipod Hyalella azteca Annex A1 ...
ICS
07.100.20
DOI
https://dx.doi.org/10.1520/E1706-20
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...
Loading recommended items...